So let's just assume I started this post with several sentences about the danger of thinking you can make meaningful observations based on a couple of games.
That glossed over, wasn't the whole point of the Davis-Szczerbiak trade supposed to be that Wally was a better offensive complement to Pierce if an inferior and unathletic defender? So am I allowed to think it odd that in the first two games of the new world order we're scoring about ~17 less points on offense than our season average and in turn holding the other team to about ~22 less points?
From a team that was scoring 98 points/game and giving up 100 points/game before the trade, the 84-79 win over Sacramento and the 83-79 loss to Milwaukee weren't quite what I was expecting.
Jus' saying.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment