As of late yesterday, Mark Blount was still a Celtic. If he somehow becomes an ex-Celtic, then you have to give a loud shout-out to Danny Ainge, particularly if the acquisition is a player whose deal is up at the end of the season. We know what Blount does and does not do. Is he a serviceable NBA big man? Yes. Is he going to be a difference-maker in the post? Probably not. But here's what really makes little sense for any team with an eye on the bottom line: Blount is due to earn an average of $8 million a year for the next four years. Blount originally signed a deal that started at the NBA-acceptable mid-level exception figure of $4.9 million. But that deal escalates -- and the final four years of the deal are worth $28.192 million. Now, add a 15 percent trade kicker (which cannot be rescinded) and the total figure for the last four years rises to more than $32 million. That's a number that could put the Timberwolves into luxury tax territory, depending on other maneuvers the team might make. So if you're Kevin McHale, you have to ask yourself: Is Blount really worth it?
Sunday, January 22, 2006
Sound familiar?
Peter May in today's Globe:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Just heard the owner of the Timberwolves commenting on the proposed Kandi-Blount deal. He said Blount was "one of the people who had been brought to our attention," but that that was just one of their options. He did make it seem pretty clear that they were going to deal Olowokandi, though.
Post a Comment